Student Name
Chamberlain University
SOCS-185 Culture and Society
Prof. Name:
Date
The U.S. Census has undergone significant changes since its inception in 1790, particularly in how it classifies individuals by race and ethnicity. Over time, the categories have expanded and evolved to better reflect the diverse population of the United States. This article delves into how racial and ethnic categories have shifted in the Census and the broader social implications of these changes.
In the first U.S. Census of 1790, racial and ethnic classifications were quite simplistic. The categories available were few, and they primarily distinguished between free white males, free white females, and slaves. The racial landscape was not as nuanced as it is today. Individuals who did not fit into the “white” or “slave” categories were classified as “all other free persons.”
As a Mexican American, I would have likely fallen into this “all other free person” category. At this point, race and ethnicity were not given much consideration. The census was focused more on gender and whether an individual was free or enslaved. This classification system did not acknowledge the complexities of ethnicity or the diversity within the American population.
By the 1820 census, there was a shift in categorization, introducing the “free colored males and females” category, which separated those who were free but of African descent from those who were enslaved. This was a step towards recognizing different racial identities, but it still left much to be desired in terms of reflecting the full diversity of the population.
The 1850 Census marked another important development as it removed gender distinctions in most racial categories. New categories were introduced, such as Mulatto, a term used to describe individuals of mixed African and European ancestry. The 1860 Census further expanded the racial categories by including Indians as a distinct race, acknowledging the presence of Native American populations in the U.S.
By 1910, Mexicans and Mexican Americans were recognized in the census, albeit in an “other” category. It was not until 1930 that the Mexican population was counted as a separate race, marking a significant turning point in the acknowledgment of Hispanic and Latino populations in the United States. However, the term Hispanic was not used in the census until much later, with the introduction of a separate category for Hispanic ethnicity in 1980.
The 2020 Census continued this trend of categorizing racial and ethnic identities in more detailed ways. For the first time, individuals could identify as Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish origin separately from their race. This allowed for a more accurate reflection of the diverse cultural backgrounds of the U.S. population.
Race is often seen as a biological concept, but social science perspectives suggest that racial classifications are, in many ways, socially constructed. Over the years, categories in the census have been shaped by societal beliefs and political forces. Ethnicity, in particular, plays a crucial role in understanding racial identity in the U.S.
In 1930, individuals from Asia were categorized as Hindu based on religion, demonstrating how ethnicity and religion can influence racial classification. The evolution of census categories reflects the changing ways in which American society views race and ethnicity. As new groups entered the country, the census categories adapted to reflect these changes, though the systems were often imperfect.
In recent years, the question of how to classify individuals who are biracial or multiracial has become more prominent. The 2020 Census offered individuals the ability to select more than one race, but the decision of which race to choose is often influenced by personal identity, societal expectations, and the desire to preserve family heritage.
For instance, biracial individuals may struggle with which race to select, often choosing the minority race or the one they feel best represents their identity. The census has also faced criticism for categorizing Middle Eastern and North African populations as White, which many argue oversimplifies the complex identities of people from this region.
As we look ahead to the 2030 Census, there is an opportunity to improve how race and ethnicity are represented. There should be greater inclusivity, particularly for transgender individuals, who are currently categorized as male or female, but often experience a gender identity that does not fit neatly into these categories. Expanding census options to include Middle Eastern as a separate category, and allowing individuals to write in their specific race if it is not listed, could lead to a more accurate representation of the population.
The U.S. Census plays a crucial role in shaping public policy and allocating resources based on population data. Ensuring that all racial and ethnic groups are accurately represented in the census is key to addressing inequality and promoting social justice.
The history of the U.S. Census highlights the changing perceptions of race and ethnicity in America. From the early days of limited categories to the more inclusive and nuanced classifications of today, the census has evolved alongside the country’s demographic changes. The future of the census should continue this trend, offering a more accurate and inclusive reflection of the country’s diverse population.
As racial and ethnic diversity continues to grow in the U.S., it is crucial that future census categories are designed to acknowledge and respect the complexity of individual identities. A more inclusive census will not only improve our understanding of the population but also ensure that all groups are treated with dignity and respect.
By embracing a more flexible and comprehensive system, we can move closer to a society where race, ethnicity, and gender are no longer barriers to opportunity, but celebrated aspects of the vibrant American identity.
Bennett, C. (2000). Racial Categories Used in the Decennial Censuses, 1790 to the Present.Government Information Quarterly,17(2),161. https://eds-b-ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=3&sid=061816d2-7d32-4a25-b2c0-d774d73cf8d7@sessionmgr101
Brown, A.(2020). The changing categories the U.S. census has used to measure race. Fact Tank news in the Numbers: https://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2020/02/25/the-changing-categories-the-u-s-has-used-to-measure-race/ #
Guo, G., Fu, Y., Lee, H., Cai, T., Mullan, K., & Li, Y. (2014). Genetic Bio-Ancestry and Social Construction of Racial Classification in Social Surveys in the Contemporary United States. Demography, 51(1), 141–172. https://eds-bebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer? vid=4&sid=a1145776-15cf-486e-bd19-64a95a7e7272%40pdc-v-sessmgr03
Hook, J., Bean, F., Bachmeier, J., & Tucker, C. (2014). Recent Trends in Coverage of the Mexican-Born Population of the United States: Results From Applying Multiple Methods Across Time .Demography, 51(2),699–726. https://eds-b-ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
Post Categories
Tags