NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 3 Health Technology Strategic Plan

NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 3 Health Technology Strategic Plan

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX6224 Healthcare Technology and Informatics

Prof. Name:

Date

Health Technology Strategic Plan

Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) represents a strategic innovation capable of reshaping healthcare delivery through continuous, data-driven patient oversight. By enabling real-time physiological data collection, RPM supports early clinical intervention, enhances chronic disease management, and improves operational efficiency. Evidence suggests that integrating RPM into healthcare systems contributes to proactive care models rather than reactive treatment approaches, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing system-wide costs (Serrano et al., 2023). This strategic plan evaluates the benefits of RPM, identifies key stakeholders, and outlines practical strategies to ensure organizational adoption and long-term success.

Benefits of Remote Patient Monitoring

RPM facilitates continuous tracking of patient health metrics using connected medical devices such as blood pressure monitors, glucose sensors, and pulse oximeters. This capability allows clinicians to detect early warning signs and intervene promptly, thereby reducing hospital readmissions and emergency visits (Charkviani et al., 2023).

From a clinical perspective, RPM enhances chronic disease management by promoting medication adherence and encouraging healthier lifestyle behaviors among patients with conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure. Instead of episodic care, patients receive continuous monitoring, which supports timely treatment adjustments and reduces complications.

NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 3 Health Technology Strategic Plan

Operationally, RPM streamlines healthcare workflows. Automated data collection minimizes manual documentation, allowing nurses and physicians to allocate more time to direct patient care. Integration with Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and telehealth platforms enables efficient patient prioritization and monitoring.

Financially, RPM reduces healthcare expenditures by preventing severe medical events and decreasing unnecessary in-person visits. Increasing reimbursement support from insurance providers further strengthens its financial feasibility (Tan et al., 2024).

Key Benefits Overview

Relevant Stakeholders and Their Impact

Successful RPM implementation depends on coordinated engagement across multiple stakeholder groups. Each group plays a distinct role in adoption and sustainability.

Internal Stakeholders

Healthcare providers—including physicians and nurses—rely on RPM data for clinical decision-making. Access to real-time patient data enhances diagnostic accuracy and reduces the need for urgent interventions. Nurses, in particular, benefit from reduced routine monitoring tasks, allowing them to focus on complex care needs (Coffey et al., 2022).

IT professionals and administrative staff are responsible for integrating RPM systems into existing digital infrastructures, ensuring data security, and managing patient onboarding. Organizational leaders and financial managers evaluate cost-effectiveness and long-term returns.

External Stakeholders

Patients are central beneficiaries of RPM, gaining improved access to care and reduced need for hospital visits. This is especially significant for individuals in rural areas or with mobility limitations (Tan et al., 2024).

Insurance providers influence adoption through reimbursement models, while device manufacturers ensure system reliability and provide technical support. Community health organizations and public agencies contribute to broader implementation and health equity initiatives.

Stakeholder Impact Summary

Expected Outcomes

RPM implementation is expected to produce measurable improvements across clinical, operational, and financial domains.

Improved Patient Care Outcomes

Continuous monitoring enables early detection of health deterioration, reducing complications and hospital admissions. Patients with chronic illnesses benefit from personalized care plans and timely interventions. Additionally, RPM encourages patient engagement, fostering better adherence to treatment and healthier behaviors (Tan et al., 2024).

Enhanced Organizational Efficiency

Automation and real-time data integration reduce administrative burden and streamline workflows. Healthcare providers can prioritize high-risk patients while minimizing unnecessary in-person visits. Improved interdisciplinary communication further enhances care coordination (Claggett, 2024).

Improved Financial Health of the Organization

RPM reduces costs associated with hospital readmissions, emergency care, and long-term disease complications. Reimbursement opportunities and optimized resource utilization contribute to financial sustainability.

Strategies for Gaining Buy-In and Support

Effective adoption of RPM requires targeted engagement strategies tailored to stakeholder needs.

Engaging Leadership with Data-Driven Evidence

Leadership support can be secured by presenting empirical evidence demonstrating RPM’s effectiveness in improving outcomes and reducing costs. Financial projections and case studies strengthen the business case, particularly when aligned with organizational performance metrics (Coffey et al., 2022).

Involving Clinicians Through Training and Demonstration

Resistance among clinicians can be mitigated through hands-on training and pilot programs. Demonstrating how RPM integrates seamlessly into workflows helps reduce concerns about increased workload (Pavithra et al., 2024).

• Conduct simulation-based training

• Implement pilot testing phases

• Identify clinician champions

Educating Patients and Caregivers

Patient engagement is essential for RPM success. Education initiatives, including workshops and telehealth demonstrations, can improve confidence in using monitoring devices. Involving caregivers enhances adherence and long-term usage (Tagne et al., 2025).

Collaborating with IT and Support Staff

Early collaboration with IT teams ensures system compatibility, cybersecurity, and smooth integration with EHR platforms. Interdisciplinary workshops can facilitate knowledge sharing and problem-solving (Coffey et al., 2022).

Engaging External Stakeholders

Aligning RPM implementation with reimbursement policies and public health initiatives strengthens external support. Partnerships with insurers and community organizations can expand access and promote health equity (Lawrence et al., 2023).

Conclusion

Remote Patient Monitoring offers a comprehensive solution to modern healthcare challenges by improving patient outcomes, enhancing operational efficiency, and reducing costs. Its successful implementation depends on strategic stakeholder engagement, effective training programs, and strong leadership support. By leveraging real-time data and fostering patient-centered care, RPM positions healthcare organizations for sustainable, high-quality service delivery.

References

Charkviani, M., Simonetto, D. A., Ahrens, D. J., Amundson, R. H., Bell, S. J., Busch, J. J., Caine, N. A., Cleveland, E. J., Coelho-Prabhu, N., Barreto, E. F., Daniels, C. E., DeZutter, M. A., Ebbert, J. O., Kattah, A. G., Kohler, C. M., Leuenberger, A. M., Pahl, D. F., Reinschmidt, K. J., & Philpot, L. M. (2023). Conceptualization of Remote Patient Monitoring program for patients with complex medical illness on hospital dismissal. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.09.005

Claggett, J. (2024). An infrastructure framework for Remote Patient Monitoring interventions and research (preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e51234. https://doi.org/10.2196/51234

NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 3 Health Technology Strategic Plan

Coffey, J. D., Christopherson, L. A., Williams, R. D., Gathje, S. R., Bell, S. J., Pahl, D. F., Manka, L., Blegen, R. N., Maniaci, M. J., Ommen, S. R., & Haddad, T. C. (2022). Development and implementation of a nurse-based Remote Patient Monitoring program for ambulatory disease management. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1052408

Lawrence, K., Singh, N., Jonassen, Z., Groom, L. L., Alfaro Arias, V., Mandal, S., Schoenthaler, A., Mann, D., Nov, O., & Dove, G. (2023). Operational implementation of remote patient monitoring within a large ambulatory health system: Multimethod qualitative case study. Journal of Medical Internet Research Human Factors, 10, e45166. https://doi.org/10.2196/45166

Pavithra, L. S., Khurdi, S., Priyanka, T. G., Patrisia, M. S., & Patrisia M. S. (2024). Impact of Remote Patient Monitoring systems on nursing time, healthcare providers, and patient satisfaction in general wards. Cureus, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61646

NURS FPX 6224 Assessment 3 Health Technology Strategic Plan

Serrano, L. P., Maita, K. C., Ávila, F. R., Guzman, R. A. T., Garcia, J. P., Eldaly, A. S., Haider, C. R., Felton, C. L., Paulson, M. R., Maniaci, M. J., & Forte, A. J. (2023). Benefits and challenges of Remote Patient Monitoring as perceived by health care practitioners: A systematic review. The Permanente Journal, 27(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/23.022

Tagne, J. F., Burns, K., O’Brien, T., Chapman, W., Cornell, P., Huckvale, K., Ameen, I., Bishop, J., Buccheri, A., Reid, J., Shee, A. W., Budge, M., Huggins, C. E., Peeters, A., & Metcalf, O. (2025). Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12427-z

Tan, S. Y., Sumner, J., Wang, Y., & Wenjun Yip, A. (2024). A systematic review of the impacts of Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) interventions on safety, adherence, quality-of-life, and cost-related outcomes. NPJ Digital Medicine, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01182-w