Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX4905 Capstone Project for Nursing
Prof. Name:
Date
The practicum experience at The Longevity Center provides a unique opportunity to engage with integrative and regenerative medicine practices. The focus of this experience is on patient-centered care and natural treatment modalities. During the practicum, the primary goal is to enhance understanding of novel therapies for chronic conditions by participating in clinical decision-making and practical learning activities. This assessment examines the practicum setting, clinical and operational decisions, and a key process problem that affects diagnosis and patient outcomes in regenerative medicine.
The practicum is conducted at The Longevity Center, an integrated medical clinic that merges traditional medical practices with modern alternative therapies. The center is dedicated to delivering patient-centric services, promoting wellness, and using regenerative medicine techniques. Its patient population is diverse, ranging from individuals seeking preventive or anti-aging treatments to patients with chronic conditions seeking regenerative solutions. This diversity allows the practicum participant to gain exposure to a wide spectrum of health conditions and treatment strategies (The Longevity Center, 2024a).
The clinical team at the center consists of three full-time healthcare professionals who collaborate closely. Decisions regarding patient care are based on individualized treatment plans, response monitoring, and long-term management strategies. As a practicum participant, active involvement in clinical and operational decision-making provides an opportunity to contribute meaningfully to patient care and process improvement. The center also emphasizes continuous learning through educational resources such as podcasts, literature, and hands-on clinical experience, fostering critical thinking, professional growth, and comprehensive care (The Longevity Center, 2024a).
Clinical and operational decisions at The Longevity Center are essential to patient outcomes.
Key clinical decisions include:
Clinical decisions often require troubleshooting patient responses, such as inflammation or delayed healing, to optimize therapy outcomes (Majewska et al., 2025).
Operational decisions focus on:
Observation of these decisions allows practicum participants to learn how operational efficiency affects patient care outcomes.
| Decision Type | Key Actions | Observed Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical | Choice of therapy (PRP or stem cell), treatment timing, dosage | Reduced inflammation, faster tissue repair, improved joint/muscle function, enhanced quality of life |
| Operational | Scheduling, documentation, resource management | Smooth clinic workflow, efficient patient management, minimized procedural delays |
Follow-up evaluations including pain scoring, range-of-motion testing, and patient satisfaction surveys are used to monitor the effectiveness of these decisions (The Longevity Center, 2024a).
A significant process problem at The Longevity Center involves slow diagnostic procedures and inconsistent identification of complex conditions, particularly chronic pain, autoimmune disorders, and fatigue syndromes. Unlike conventional clinics with structured diagnostic workflows, patients at The Longevity Center often arrive after multiple unsuccessful consultations elsewhere, presenting without a clear diagnosis.
Conventional medical models typically focus on symptom management rather than identifying underlying causes, which can lead to patient frustration and ineffective long-term solutions (Dutra et al., 2025). For example, patients with chronic joint pain may receive medication or surgery recommendations without being offered regenerative therapies such as PRP injections, which can restore tissue function with minimal invasiveness.
| Problem Area | Description | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic delays | Incomplete or slow evaluation of complex chronic conditions | Delayed treatment initiation, prolonged suffering, functional decline |
| Patient history gaps | Patients arrive after multiple failed consultations | Redundant testing, increased costs, frustration |
| Lack of standardized intake | No structured diagnostic protocol | Inconsistent care, reduced patient trust |
Delays in accurate diagnosis can extend patient suffering, increase psychological burden, and reduce confidence in healthcare systems. Misdiagnosis and delayed treatment are also costly; OECD nations report that diagnostic errors contribute to approximately 17.5% of healthcare expenditures, with potential savings of up to 8% if errors are reduced (Slawomirski et al., 2025).
Diagnostic inefficiencies affect patient care quality, safety, and cost.
Quality:Â Delays can prevent timely initiation of regenerative therapies, which may reduce treatment efficacy. Accurate diagnosis is essential to tailor treatments like PRP or stem cell injections to individual patient needs (Popescu et al., 2021).
Safety: Late or incorrect diagnoses can exacerbate chronic inflammation, autoimmune dysfunction, and soft tissue damage, potentially leading to irreversible complications. Patients who have undergone previous treatments or medications may also face additional side effects (Kvarnström et al., 2021).
Cost: Diagnostic delays increase both clinic and patient expenses. Reassessment, detailed history reviews, and extended treatment periods demand extra resources. For example, PRP injections range from \$175–\$4,973, and BMA/BMC treatments from \$3,688–\$4,379 (Charnoff et al., 2022). Frequent and costly procedures can discourage patients from pursuing further care. Approximately 70% of patients at the center report dissatisfaction with prior conventional diagnostic approaches (The Longevity Center, 2024a).
| Domain | Effect | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | Delayed treatment initiation, reduced therapy efficacy | Ineffective PRP or stem cell treatment due to late diagnosis |
| Safety | Increased risk of chronic inflammation or irreversible damage | Patients with prior failed treatments at risk of side effects |
| Cost | Higher financial burden on patients and clinic | Multiple tests, longer care duration, expensive regenerative procedures |
Streamlining intake and diagnostic processes is essential to improve outcomes, enhance patient safety, and reduce overall costs.
The practicum at The Longevity Center offers valuable insight into regenerative healthcare practices. While the center excels in personalized and non-invasive treatments, diagnostic delays represent a critical process problem. Addressing this issue by standardizing intake and improving diagnostic efficiency can enhance patient outcomes, reduce operational costs, and strengthen the clinic’s mission of promoting long-term wellness through advanced natural interventions.
Charnoff, J., Rothman, R., Andres Bergos, J., Rodeo, S., Casey, E., & Cheng, J. (2022). Variability in patient-incurred costs and protocols of regenerative medicine procedures for musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 19(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316221105880
Dutra, S., Reigado, G. R., Santos, M., Sardinha, D., Hernandes, S., Marchi, B. L., Zhivov, E., Chambergo, F. S., & Nunes, V. A. (2025). Advances in regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration and rejuvenation. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1527854
Kvarnström, K., Westerholm, A., Airaksinen, M., & Liira, H. (2021). Factors contributing to medication adherence in patients with a chronic condition: A scoping review of qualitative research. Pharmaceutics, 13(7), 1100. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13071100
Majewska, L., Kijowski, J., & Dorosz, K. (2025). Effect of patient age on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and fibrin treatments for skin density and thickness: A single-center ultrasound study. Life, 15(2), 308–308. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020308
Popescu, M. N., Iliescu, M. G., Beiu, C., Popa, L. G., Mihai, M. M., Berteanu, & Ionescu, A. M. (2021). Autologous platelet-rich plasma efficacy in the field of regenerative medicine: Product and quality control. BioMed Research International, 2021, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4672959
Slawomirski, L., Kelly, D., de Bienassis, K., Kallas, K.-A., & Klazinga, N. (2025). The economics of diagnostic safety. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Health Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/fc61057a-en
The Longevity Center. (2024a). Integrative and regenerative treatments. The Longevity Center FL – Nurturing Health at Its Source. https://www.thelcfl.com/
The Longevity Center. (2024b). PRP Injections. The Longevity Center FL – Nurturing Health at Its Source. https://www.thelcfl.com/our-services/regenerative-therapies/prp-injections/
Post Categories
Tags