NU577 Unit 8 Seminar Alternative Assignment Reflection and Case Review

Student Name

Purdue University Global

NU577 NP II Clinical – Women’s Health Focus

Prof. Name:

Date

Unit 8 Seminar Alternative Assignment: VR Patient Review and Treatment Management Reflection

Effective patient management requires avoiding premature diagnostic assumptions, applying evidence-based clinical guidelines, and considering the complete patient presentation before developing a treatment plan. In reviewing Vanessa’s and Moses’s virtual reality (VR) patient cases, I learned the importance of maintaining a broad clinical perspective, using current standards of practice, and creating individualized care plans based on each patient’s needs rather than focusing only on familiar diagnoses or routine treatments.

Vanessa’s Case Review: Uncontrolled Diabetes and Hypertension Management

Vanessa presented with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM II) and uncontrolled hypertension (HTN), likely related to non-adherence to dietary recommendations and prescribed medications. Her evaluation also required ruling out hypothyroidism as a possible contributing factor.

During the case review, I recognized that I allowed my initial assumptions to influence my clinical decision-making. I focused heavily on Vanessa’s existing medications and developed a plan centered around restarting those medications because, during the VR interview, she expressed willingness to follow my recommendations.

Although medication adherence was an important factor, my approach became too narrow. I developed tunnel vision by concentrating on one aspect of her care instead of fully exploring all possible contributors to her uncontrolled conditions.

Applying Evidence-Based Guidelines to Vanessa’s Treatment Plan

The review emphasized the importance of following established clinical guidelines, including recommendations from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and hypertension management guidelines.

A more effective approach would include:

Reviewing Vanessa’s complete health history and current symptoms.
Assessing barriers affecting medication and lifestyle adherence.
Evaluating whether her current treatment plan requires adjustment.
Considering additional diagnostic evaluation, including screening for conditions such as hypothyroidism.
Developing a comprehensive plan that addresses diabetes, hypertension, lifestyle factors, and patient education.

Initially, I attempted to take a conservative approach by essentially restarting her previous treatment plan. However, after reviewing the seminar discussion, I understand that clinical management requires more than returning patients to previous therapies. Healthcare providers must continually reassess patients, identify areas for improvement, and make evidence-based changes that support better outcomes.

Moses’s Case Review: Wrist Pain Evaluation and Treatment Management

Moses’s case involved a relatively straightforward diagnosis; however, I became more focused on exploring additional treatment options rather than following the most appropriate initial management strategy.

My original plan was to provide wrist splinting and refer Moses to an orthopedic specialist. This approach aligned with appropriate conservative management principles. However, I overanalyzed the case and considered whether oral corticosteroids could provide symptom relief.

I was uncertain about the role of steroid injections within a primary care setting and reviewed American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) recommendations for treatment. In doing so, I moved away from my initial plan and introduced an intervention that was not necessarily the best first step for this patient.

Lessons Learned From the VR Patient Encounters

The biggest lesson from reviewing both cases was the importance of avoiding unnecessary complexity when developing treatment plans. Clinical reasoning requires balancing evidence-based recommendations with the individual needs and circumstances of each patient.

Moving forward, I will focus on:

Avoiding preconceived ideas that may lead to familiar but incomplete diagnoses.
Performing a comprehensive patient assessment before selecting treatment options.
Using clinical guidelines as a foundation while considering the patient’s overall presentation.
Collaborating with preceptors and continuing to strengthen diagnostic and treatment skills.

These cases demonstrated that managing patient encounters can be challenging, especially when multiple factors influence diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, reflection and feedback are essential parts of becoming a more effective healthcare provider. Through continued practice and guidance from experienced clinicians, I will continue improving my ability to diagnose conditions accurately and develop appropriate, evidence-based treatment plans.

References

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2020). Management of carpal tunnel syndrome: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. AAOS. https://www.aaos.org/carpaltunnelguideline

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2025). Standards of care in diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care, 48(Supplement 1). https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue