Student Name
Chamberlain University
NR 715 Week 1 The Theory- Practice Gap and Nursing Research
Prof. Name:
Date
Translation science theories and models serve as essential frameworks for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practices in nursing and healthcare. These models help narrow the persistent gap between research and practice by offering systematic approaches for introducing and sustaining change. By applying such frameworks, nursing professionals can identify strategies that address barriers to adoption, evaluate interventions in real time, and ultimately improve both patient care quality and healthcare system efficiency.
The primary aim of this discussion is to strengthen the ability of advanced practice nurses to select, evaluate, and apply translation science theories when addressing clinical practice issues. Through this application, practitioners not only learn to critically appraise research evidence but also to tailor it to their organizational context. This process supports a culture of continuous quality improvement and enhances the sustainability of practice innovations.
Reflection on a specific practice issue provides an opportunity to apply translation science theories meaningfully. The following guiding questions are addressed in this discussion:
A recurring challenge in many clinical environments is delayed patient readiness at the time of scheduled appointments. Patients frequently arrive without having completed necessary pre-visit requirements, such as fasting, bringing medications, or completing forms. These delays disrupt clinic flow, prolong waiting times, and reduce overall patient satisfaction.
To address this issue, the Rapid Cycle Improvement (RCI) Model is a suitable choice. This model emphasizes iterative testing of small, targeted changes and relies on quick feedback cycles to refine processes. It has been widely adopted in healthcare for enhancing efficiency, improving workflow, and achieving sustainable improvements (Cowdell et al., 2019).
The Rapid Cycle Improvement (RCI) Model is built on the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework. Its components are summarized below:
Component | Description |
---|---|
Plan | Identify a clear problem, develop a testable hypothesis, and design a small-scale intervention. |
Do | Implement the change on a pilot basis within a controlled setting. |
Study | Gather and analyze outcome data to evaluate whether the intervention achieved its intended effect. |
Act | Based on findings, adopt the change, modify it for better results, or abandon it if ineffective. |
Repeat Cycle | Continue iterative cycles to refine interventions and ensure sustainable practice change. |
This structured approach allows healthcare providers to rapidly test and refine interventions, ensuring that only strategies with proven effectiveness are scaled up across larger populations.
Despite the benefits of translation science, several obstacles limit the successful integration of evidence into practice:
Organizational Resistance:Â Staff may resist new changes due to perceived workload increases, fear of failure, or lack of engagement in decision-making.
Knowledge–Practice Gap: Nurses often face difficulties reconciling evidence-based guidelines with routine clinical habits, creating inconsistencies in practice (Greenway et al., 2019).
Resource Limitations:Â Staffing shortages, inadequate electronic health records, or insufficient funding can limit the ability to fully implement new models.
Time Constraints:Â High patient caseloads reduce opportunities for reflection, data collection, and adaptation of new practices.
Policy and System Barriers:Â Institutional policies may fail to support innovation or provide the flexibility needed for practice transformation (Leach & Tucker, 2018).
Addressing these barriers requires strong leadership support, targeted staff training, and the establishment of interdisciplinary teams to ensure that interventions are realistic, scalable, and sustainable.
This discussion demonstrates alignment with program competencies by:
Integrating scientific evidence into daily nursing practice (POs 3, 5).
Applying leadership skills to guide organizational change and enhance outcomes (PO 6).
Using analytical strategies to translate research findings into practical innovations (POs 3, 5).
Evaluating the use of information systems and technology to support evidence-based practice (POs 6, 7).
Advocating for equity in healthcare delivery while addressing the impact of social determinants (POs 2, 9).
Synthesizing current evidence to promote prevention-focused strategies and improve population health outcomes (PO 1).
Strengthening professional identity, resilience, and accountability in advanced nursing practice (POs 1, 4).
Through engagement with translation science theories and their application to practice, students will be able to:
Critically appraise global healthcare challenges and connect them to DNP practice innovations (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 9).
Integrate ethical decision-making principles when applying quality improvement and translation science models (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 8; POs 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials
Bekemeier, B., Delaney, K., Wenzl, S., Roberts, M., & Hersh, D. (2020). The diamond project: A quality improvement model for adopting shared service delivery in the Washington vaccines for children program. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00272
Cowdell, J. C., Smoot, T. B., Murray, L. P., Stancampiano, F. F., & Hedges, M. S. (2019). A rapid cycle improvement approach to increase patient readiness at their scheduled appointment time. Quality Management in Health Care, 28(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000194
Franklin, B. (2019, November 4). Avedis Donabedian and the birth of healthcare quality assurance. Healthcare Market Review. https://healthcaremarketreview.com/avedis-donabedian-and-the-birth-of-healthcare-quality-assurance
Greenway, K., Butt, G., & Walthall, H. (2019). What is a theory–practice gap? An exploration of the concept. Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.005
Hickman, L., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., Rao, A., Newton, P., Jackson, D., & Ferguson, C. (2018). Improving evidence-based practice in postgraduate nursing programs: A systematic review: Bridging the evidence practice gap (BRIDGE project). Nurse Education Today, 63, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.015
Leach, M., & Tucker, B. (2018). Current understandings of the research–practice gap in nursing: A mixed-methods study. Collegian, 25(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.04.008
White, K., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. (2021). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
Zaccagnini, M. E., & Pechacek, J. (2021). The Doctor of Nursing Practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Post Categories
Tags