Student Name
Chamberlain University
NR-505: Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice
Prof. Name:
Date
Qualitative research plays a vital role in nursing and healthcare, offering an in-depth exploration of human experiences, perceptions, and motivations. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data, qualitative research presents its findings in words. This method is often conducted in natural settings, where the context and environment play a significant role in shaping the outcomes. This article explores the insights gained from a qualitative study, particularly its application in understanding patient experiences with pressure ulcer prevention, and compares it to other research designs.
Qualitative research is distinguished by its emphasis on exploring subjective experiences and perceptions. In healthcare, this approach is particularly valuable for understanding how patients perceive care and the effectiveness of interventions. The research is often conducted in real-world settings, which helps to capture a more authentic representation of patient experiences.
For example, the study in question focused on examining patients’ experiences with various resources used in pressure ulcer prevention. The researchers sought to assess the appropriateness of these resources based on patients’ individual conditions. This qualitative descriptive study was able to shed light on the personal experiences and perceptions of patients, offering valuable insights into the efficacy of the interventions used.
One of the challenges faced when conducting qualitative research is identifying the appropriate articles. Unlike quantitative studies, which are often easier to identify through numerical data, qualitative studies require a more nuanced search approach. In this case, using CINAHL with full-text access significantly broadened the search scope, helping to identify relevant studies.
Additionally, tools like the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E evidence appraisal tool proved to be invaluable. This tool helped differentiate qualitative studies from other research types by guiding the researcher through each step of the evaluation process. When reviewing the article, the title of the study clearly indicated it was a qualitative descriptive study, making it easier to confirm its relevance. However, the researcher still read the entire article to ensure its appropriateness for the study.
Each research design serves a distinct purpose and utilizes different methods for sample selection, data collection, and result analysis. In qualitative research, data collection often involves interviews, focus groups, or observations, where the researcher seeks to understand participants’ experiences and feelings. This contrasts with quantitative research, which relies on numerical data to measure and analyze variables.
The researcher’s experience with both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as a mixed-method approach, has led to a preference for mixed-method research. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches offers the best of both worlds: it allows for a deeper understanding of patient experiences and perspectives, while also providing the numerical data needed for broader generalizations. This approach is particularly useful in healthcare settings, where both patient satisfaction and measurable outcomes are crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions.
In conclusion, qualitative research offers valuable insights into patient experiences and perceptions, particularly in areas like pressure ulcer prevention. While it can be challenging to find relevant qualitative studies, tools like CINAHL and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice tool can greatly assist in identifying and evaluating articles. The preference for mixed-method research is growing, as it provides a comprehensive view of healthcare outcomes by combining both qualitative and quantitative data. This holistic approach is essential for improving patient care and enhancing the effectiveness of healthcare interventions.
Author, A.A., Author, B.B., & Author, C.C. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page numbers. DOI
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E. (Year). Evidence appraisal tool. Johns Hopkins University.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Post Categories
Tags