FG003 Academic and Professional Integrity

FG003 Academic and Professional Integrity

Student Name

Western Governors University

D024 Professional Presence and Influence

Prof. Name:

Date

FG003 Assessment: Academic and Professional Integrity

Relationship Between Academic Integrity and Writing

Academic integrity forms the foundation of scholarly communication by promoting honesty, fairness, and accountability in all academic pursuits. It establishes expectations that the ideas and written work submitted by learners genuinely represent their independent efforts and intellectual engagement. According to Bieliauskaitė (2021), maintaining integrity ensures that academic communities function on principles of transparency, respect, and trust—qualities essential for sustaining credible knowledge production.

In academic writing, one of the most fundamental components of integrity is the accurate acknowledgment of sources. Fatemi and Saito (2019) emphasize that proper citation not only demonstrates respect for the intellectual contributions of others but also protects writers from the academic misconduct of plagiarism. Failing to attribute sources misrepresents authorship and undermines the core values of scholarship. On the other hand, using recognized referencing formats such as APA, MLA, or Chicago signals respect for intellectual property and reinforces ethical academic behavior.

Table 1

Importance of Citations in Academic Writing

Academic Integrity and the Importance of Originality

Originality is another essential aspect of academic integrity. It involves presenting new insights, interpretations, or analyses rather than merely replicating the work of others. As students and scholars contribute to academic conversations, originality promotes innovation, critical thinking, and intellectual growth. In educational environments, academic integrity guides students to think independently and engage creatively with existing literature.

The pursuit of originality strengthens academic development by encouraging learners to explore complex issues, form unique arguments, and reflect deeply on course content. A lack of originality—particularly through plagiarism—hinders intellectual maturity and restricts meaningful learning experiences. Upholding originality also supports high-quality research outcomes and maintains the legitimacy of academic credentials.

Relationship Between Professional Practices and Scholarly Ethics

Scholarly ethics and professional conduct are closely connected, especially in fields such as nursing, where ethical behavior influences both academic work and patient care. Scholarly ethics promote transparency, responsible reporting, intellectual honesty, and fairness in the dissemination of research (Artino et al., 2019). These values directly inform how healthcare professionals apply evidence-based knowledge to clinical decision-making.

For nurses, ethical principles such as autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence serve as guiding pillars that shape patient-centered care (Zhou et al., 2024). Upholding these values ensures that practitioners maintain respect for patients’ rights, confidentiality, and well-being. Through adherence to professional and scholarly ethics, nursing practice remains grounded in compassion, accountability, and informed judgment.

Ethics in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) integrates clinical expertise, ethical considerations, patient preferences, and current research findings. EBP depends heavily on scholarly ethics because clinical decisions are only as reliable as the evidence informing them. Research must be conducted and published ethically to ensure accurate, unbiased, and trustworthy guidance for patient care.

Nurses rely on current scholarly literature to stay updated with medical advancements, best practices, and patient safety guidelines. The ethical dissemination of research via peer-reviewed journals, professional conferences, and continuing education programs ensures that practitioners have access to credible and relevant information.

Grammarly, Turnitin, and Paraphrasing Contributing to Academic Integrity

Digital tools such as Grammarly and Turnitin play an important role in supporting ethical academic writing. Grammarly assists writers by identifying grammatical errors, unclear phrasing, and instances of accidental plagiarism. Zinkevich and Ledeneva (2021) note that such tools strengthen the clarity and quality of academic writing while promoting ethical practices.

Turnitin is widely used to detect similarities between student submissions and existing sources. According to El-Muwalla and Badran (2020), Turnitin compares documents against an extensive database and generates similarity reports that help learners identify areas requiring paraphrasing or citation.

Table 2

Comparison of Grammarly and Turnitin**

Effective Paraphrasing for Academic Integrity

Paraphrasing involves restating ideas from a source using original wording and sentence structure while preserving the intended meaning. Effective paraphrasing demonstrates comprehension, promotes academic growth, and prevents plagiarism. It also allows writers to integrate research findings into their arguments while maintaining their own academic voice.

Key Steps in Effective Paraphrasing

1. Read and fully understand the original passage.

2. Note the core concepts without copying exact sentences.

3. Rewrite the ideas using different vocabulary and structure.

4. Ensure the original meaning is preserved.

5. Cite the source appropriately.

This approach ensures ethical writing, respects intellectual property, and aligns with academic integrity standards.

Use of Grammarly and Turnitin for My Assessment

While preparing this assessment, both Grammarly and Turnitin were used extensively to ensure the work maintained strong academic integrity. Grammarly assisted in improving clarity, sentence structure, and grammar. Its suggestions helped refine vocabulary and strengthen academic tone. After revising the final draft, Turnitin was used to check for similarity and ensure that all paraphrased content was accurately cited. Reviewing the Turnitin report allowed for necessary corrections and guaranteed that the final submission reflected originality and academic honesty.

PART 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Academic Work as an MSN Student

As I progress through the MSN program, maintaining academic integrity is essential for building strong professional habits and ensuring high-quality scholarship. The following strategies support ethical academic performance:

Strategies for Maintaining Integrity in MSN Coursework

These strategies help uphold honesty, foster intellectual growth, and strengthen academic writing skills.

Professional Work as a Nurse

Ethical practice as a nurse is essential for safeguarding patient rights, promoting trust, and ensuring safe healthcare delivery. The following approaches support professional integrity throughout my career:

Strategies for Ethical Nursing Practice

These strategies not only uphold ethical standards but also promote lifelong learning and professional accountability.

References

Artino, A. R., Driessen, E. W., & Maggio, L. A. (2019). Ethical shades of gray. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002412

Bieliauskaitė, J. (2021). Solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6

El-Muwalla, M., & Badran, A. (2020). Turnitin: Building academic integrity against plagiarism to underpin innovation. Higher Education in the Arab World, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37834-9_11

FG003 Academic and Professional Integrity

Fatemi, G., & Saito, E. (2019). Unintentional plagiarism and academic integrity: The challenges and needs of postgraduate international students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2019.1683521

Monroe, H. A. (2019). Nurses’ professional values: Influences of experience and ethics education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9–10), 2009–2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14806

Zhou, J., Qin, Q., Chen, S., & Zhang, H. (2024). Moral dilemmas regarding physical restraints in intensive care units: Understanding autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice in using physical restraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 1619–1627. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S455910

Zinkevich, N. A., & Ledeneva, T. V. (2021). Using Grammarly to enhance students’ academic writing skills. Professional Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-51-63