Student Name
Western Governors University
D220 Information Technology in Nursing Practice
Prof. Name:
Date
The decision to place the patient on contact precautions is primarily informed by specific data documented in the EMR. Among the options, the laboratory report from the patient’s last hospitalization that shows a positive specimen culture result for MRSA is the most direct and reliable source. This lab result confirms the presence of MRSA, justifying the use of contact precautions to prevent transmission.
Other EMR data such as the history and physical notes indicating wet-to-dry dressing changes are less relevant because wet-to-dry dressings are not specific to MRSA treatment. Similarly, the medication administration record indicating a course of antibiotics does not specify if these were for MRSA or another infection, and nursing flowsheets noting a swollen elbow with drainage may reflect other conditions not necessarily related to MRSA.
| Option | Source of EMR Data | Relevance to MRSA Contact Precautions | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | History and physical notes (wet-to-dry dressing changes) | Not relevant | Wet-to-dry dressings are not a specific MRSA treatment. |
| B | Same as A | Not relevant | Duplicate of A; no impact on MRSA precautions. |
| C | Medication administration record (antibiotics) | Indirect relevance | Antibiotics may have been used for different infections. |
| D | Laboratory report (positive MRSA culture) | Highly relevant | Confirms MRSA presence, justifying contact precautions. |
| E | Nursing flowsheets (swollen elbow with drainage) | Not relevant | Swelling and drainage could stem from other causes. |
In determining the need for droplet precautions, the radiology impression report indicating consolidation in bilateral lungs is the most significant finding. Lung consolidation suggests pneumonia, which is commonly caused by infectious agents spread through respiratory droplets, necessitating droplet precautions to prevent disease transmission.
Other data such as a history of asthma, elevated white blood cells, or wheezing on auscultation provide supportive but less direct evidence. Asthma itself does not require droplet precautions, elevated white blood cells are a general marker of infection but not specific to droplet precautions, and wheezing alone does not indicate a contagious respiratory infection.
| Option | EMR Data Source | Indicator for Droplet Precautions | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Complete health history (asthma) | No | Asthma is a chronic condition, not contagious. |
| B | Radiology impression (lung consolidation) | Yes | Consolidation suggests pneumonia, requiring droplet precautions. |
| C | Complete blood count (elevated WBC) | No | Indicates infection but not type or transmission mode. |
| D | Nursing flowsheet (wheezing) | No | Wheezing does not indicate droplet precautions need. |
The specimen collection results in the EMR provide the most definitive support for an influenza diagnosis. Laboratory testing can confirm the presence of the influenza virus, either by rapid antigen detection or PCR tests, which guide appropriate treatment and isolation measures.
Other data sources such as radiology impressions, nursing flowsheets, or history and physical notes may provide context or symptom documentation but do not confirm the diagnosis.
The primary goal of the CDS tool here is to prevent harm to the patient by identifying risk factors before surgery. Obstructive sleep apnea increases perioperative risks, such as airway obstruction or complications with anesthesia. The CDS alert prompts clinicians to take necessary precautions, such as enhanced monitoring or altered anesthesia plans, thereby improving patient safety.
While improving compliance with federal regulations or decreasing reportable events are important, they are secondary outcomes. The tool’s immediate aim is patient harm prevention.
To assess the patient’s ability to engage in care and education, the nurse should focus on identifying any barriers to the patient’s care. Barriers could include cognitive impairments, language differences, health literacy, or socioeconomic factors that affect understanding and participation in treatment.
While the patient’s willingness to engage and family support are important, they do not fully determine ability. Access to education alone also does not guarantee engagement.
Social media platforms offer a cost-effective and rapid method for disseminating information in rural areas. They allow hospitals to reach a broad audience quickly, encourage interaction, and promote patient engagement through targeted content.
In contrast, traditional methods like radio, newspapers, or billboards tend to be more expensive or less effective, particularly in rural settings with low traffic or limited reach.
The nurse’s first step should be to interview staff to understand why printed reports are being used. This assessment can uncover workflow challenges, usability issues, or other reasons for reliance on printed materials. Addressing root causes is more effective than immediately restricting printing or reporting the issue.
Education on the risks of using printed data and collaboration with leadership would follow after understanding the underlying issues.
A multidisciplinary team is best suited for reviewing and updating order sets. This group would include healthcare providers, nurses, informatics staff, pharmacists, and possibly other stakeholders. Multidisciplinary input ensures that the most current and evidence-based treatments are incorporated, supporting safe, effective patient care.
| Staff Role | Contribution to Order Set Review |
|---|---|
| Informatics staff | Technical support and database maintenance |
| Healthcare providers | Clinical expertise and evidence-based treatment knowledge |
| Nurses | Practical insights into nursing care and workflow |
| Leadership (e.g., CNO) | Guidance, oversight, and resource allocation |
Observing end users to understand their workflow and device needs is essential. This direct observation helps identify what features and specifications are required, ensuring that the chosen devices enhance efficiency and meet clinical demands.
Other considerations like disinfectability, budget, and security features are important but should follow after identifying user needs.
The statement “With automated machines and computers, the number of nurses who encounter errors has increased” reflects a misunderstanding. In fact, health information systems aim to reduce errors by automating processes, standardizing documentation, and providing clinical decision support.
Other comments correctly recognize improvements in inventory management, real-time access to records, and the positive impact of HIS on community-focused care.
The foremost concern is the potential risk of a data breach involving sensitive patient medical information stored virtually. Ensuring data security and confidentiality is critical, especially with virtualized systems that may be vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Other potential issues like resistance to new technology or delays in care are secondary and generally manageable with proper training and workflow design. Healthcare organizations are encouraged to use standard language in the data they report. What is the benefit of standardizing the data each organization reports?
Standardizing data enables organizations to benchmark performance effectively. Using uniform terminology and formats allows for meaningful comparison across institutions, facilitating quality improvement initiatives and regulatory compliance.
While visualization methods like scatterplots or fishbone diagrams are helpful, the key advantage of standardization lies in benchmarking and comparability.
An informatics nurse specialist can use KDD to explore information and knowledge related to nursing practice. This includes analyzing large datasets to identify patterns, outcomes, or areas needing improvement, thereby supporting evidence-based practice and enhancing patient care.
Limiting treatments, creating individualized care plans, or writing clinical policies are better addressed through clinical judgment and other processes, rather than solely through KDD.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a 30-day period to define repeat patient admissions under the HRRP. This window is used to measure hospital readmission rates, aiming to reduce avoidable readmissions and improve care quality.
Nursing informatics integrates nursing science with information and analytical sciences to identify, define, manage, and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. This interdisciplinary field supports clinical decision-making and enhances patient outcomes by optimizing information management.
It does not include data engineering or behavioral health science as primary components, but focuses on applying informatics principles within nursing.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Infection control guidance for healthcare professionals about coronavirus (COVID-19). https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/index.html
HealthIT.gov. (2023). Clinical decision support. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/clinical-decision-support
Institute of Medicine. (2011). Health IT and patient safety: Building safer systems for better care. The National Academies Press.
National Institute of Nursing Research. (2022). Nursing informatics: The intersection of nursing science, computer science, and information science. https://www.ninr.nih.gov/researchandfunding/spotlight-on-nursing-research/nursing-informatics
U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program
World Health Organization. (2023). Standardization of terminology in health data. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications
Post Categories
Tags