Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 4

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and Ethical Practice in Healthcare

Historical Development and Influence of DEI in Healthcare

Over the past several decades, healthcare systems have increasingly embraced diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) principles to correct longstanding disparities and improve patient outcomes. Historically, marginalized groups encountered systemic barriers such as inadequate access to care, poor representation, and culturally insensitive services. Legislative frameworks like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the implementation of the National Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) Standards have been pivotal in compelling healthcare organizations to deliver more inclusive and patient-centered care (Martinez et al., 2024).

Today, DEI has evolved beyond academic discourse and into active clinical implementation. Healthcare institutions now incorporate implicit bias training, diverse hiring practices, and policy reforms to address health inequities. For example, maternal health programs are tailored to mitigate racial disparities in maternal outcomes, particularly among Black women. Additionally, multilingual telemedicine services are increasingly utilized to bridge communication gaps between providers and non-English-speaking patients (Shin et al., 2023). Accreditation organizations such as The Joint Commission now embed DEI metrics in evaluation criteria, underlining the importance of organizational accountability in promoting equitable care (The Joint Commission, 2023).

The Role of Unconscious Bias and Microaggressions in Patient Care

Unconscious biases are implicit attitudes and stereotypes that influence healthcare providers’ decisions and interactions, often without their awareness. These biases can manifest as microaggressions—subtle comments or actions that demean or marginalize patients based on their identity. For example, assumptions that a Black patient is less likely to follow a treatment plan can negatively shape provider behavior and diminish quality of care (Meidert et al., 2023).

Such implicit behaviors, shaped by societal conditioning, can create a clinical environment where favoritism is extended to those perceived as culturally similar. This dynamic undermines trust and safety, often leading to patients feeling alienated or emotionally distressed (Desai et al., 2023). Consequently, combating unconscious bias requires structured educational interventions and reflective practices to cultivate equitable and respectful care environments.

Strategies to Mitigate Bias and Promote Inclusion

Numerous evidence-based initiatives have been developed to combat bias and support inclusive practices in healthcare. Cultural Competency Education Programs (CCEP) are widely used to teach healthcare professionals about different belief systems, communication norms, and cultural values, which enhances their ability to provide tailored care (Rukadikar et al., 2022). Similarly, Implicit Bias Training encourages self-reflection and facilitates awareness through workshops, simulations, and feedback (Fricke et al., 2023).

Community-engaged strategies like the Health Equity Advocacy Program (HEAP) involve providers and patients in exploring social determinants of health and building equity-focused healthcare systems (UCLA Health, 2025). In parallel, leadership-focused programs such as the Inclusive Leadership Development Program (ILDP) train executives to embed equity into decision-making processes and create diverse, inclusive work environments (Dewhirst, 2024). These approaches collectively reinforce an organizational culture that values inclusion and equitable care delivery.

DEI’s Contribution to Patient Satisfaction and Health Outcomes

The application of DEI in clinical settings significantly enhances both health outcomes and patient satisfaction. By understanding and incorporating patients’ cultural, religious, and personal values into care plans, providers foster stronger therapeutic alliances and improve adherence to treatment (Rukadikar et al., 2022). For example, customizing meal plans to accommodate religious dietary restrictions demonstrates respect and increases patient trust.

Furthermore, when patients perceive their environment as inclusive and respectful, they are more likely to engage actively in care decisions and express their concerns openly. This openness contributes to higher satisfaction rates and fosters a sense of psychological safety (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). Ultimately, DEI-driven care ensures that all individuals—regardless of background—receive equitable treatment, thereby reducing health disparities and improving organizational ethics.

Conclusion

Incorporating DEI principles into healthcare is essential for promoting ethical, inclusive, and patient-centered care. By addressing unconscious bias, investing in cultural education, and cultivating inclusive leadership, healthcare institutions can enhance communication, improve patient trust, and drive better outcomes. DEI is not merely a moral imperative—it is foundational to delivering equitable healthcare for all.

Table: Summary of DEI and Ethics in Healthcare

References

Desai, V., Conte, A. H., Nguyen, V. T., Shin, P., Sudol, N. T., Hobbs, J., & Qiu, C. (2023). Veiled harm: Impacts of microaggressions on psychological safety and physician burnout. The Permanente Journal, 27(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/23.017

Dewhirst, E. (2024). Improving leadership development programs through the integration of ACT – ProQuest. Proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/d9d3773a11900c4508948631c3bd3c3d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Fricke, J., Siddique, S. M., Aysola, J., Cohen, M. E., & Mull, N. K. (2023). Healthcare worker implicit bias training and education: Rapid review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK600156/

Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 4

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(158), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Martinez, R. M., Taffe, R., & Alper, J. (2024). The history, evolution, and impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion, and health equity in health organizations and systems, public health, and government. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603467/

Meidert, U., Dönnges, G., Bucher, T., Wieber, F., & Grote, A. G. (2023). Unconscious bias among health professionals: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166569

Rukadikar, C., Mali, S., Bajpai, R., Rukadikar, A., & Singh, A. (2022). A review on cultural competency in medical education. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(8), 4319–4329. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2503_21

Shin, T. M., Dodenhoff, K. A., Pardy, M., Wehner, A. S., Rafla, S., McDowell, L. D., & Thompson, N. M. D. (2023). Providing equitable care for patients with non-English language preference in telemedicine: Training on working with interpreters in telehealth. MedEdPORTAL. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11367

Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 4

The Joint Commission. (2023). The Joint Commission launches Health Care Equity Certification. The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/news-and-multimedia/news/2023/06/the-joint-commission-launches-health-care-equity-certification/

UCLA Health. (2025). Health Equity & Advocacy. UCLA Health. https://www.uclahealth.org/departments/medicine/internal-medicine/im-residency/scholarship/pathways/health-equity-advocacy