BUS FPX 4046 Assessment 4 Dispute Resolution & Labor Relations

Student Name

Capella University

BUS-FPX4046 Employee and Labor Relations

Prof. Name:

Date

Introduction

This paper explores the complexities of conducting effective and legally defensible workplace investigations, focusing on human resources (HR) best practices for managing internal grievance procedures, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) practices, and labor laws related to employee labor unions. It also considers the ethical implications of unfair employer labor practices. Through a class scenario, various questions arise regarding the appropriate next steps after a meeting with Les, methods for preparation, decision-making processes, and key aspects of the case that raise concern.

Key Issues

Several key issues emerge in the investigation process. First, it is crucial to ensure confidentiality for Les throughout the investigation, protecting her privacy. Second, measures must be put in place to shield Les from any further harassment, such as offering the options of transfer, a leave of absence (LOA), or adjusted work schedules. Another important consideration is selecting an objective and experienced investigator to handle the situation impartially. Moreover, a detailed plan for gathering evidence and conducting interviews must be developed, with a focus on creating focused, unbiased questions. Interviews with Karla and potential witnesses should aim to gather relevant evidence. The investigation should proceed by making decisions based on the collected evidence and the organization’s policies. At the conclusion of the investigation, the outcomes should be communicated to both parties, and preventive measures should be implemented. Finally, a comprehensive written summary of the investigation’s findings should be prepared.

Best Practices

Grievances, which are formal complaints related to dissatisfaction in the workplace, should be addressed using a grievance form. Supervisors must respond within five days. If the grievance is unresolved, it should be escalated within the company or involve union representatives for further resolution to prevent potential litigation. Grievances often arise from economic issues, working conditions, lack of supervision, favoritism, biased behavior, or conflicts between employees, all of which can lead to negative outcomes such as reduced productivity, decreased quality, absenteeism, accidents, and high turnover rates.

Comparison of Practices

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) practices emphasize confidentiality, conflict resolution, and maintaining productivity in the workplace. Common ADR methods include arbitration, negotiation, mediation, private judging, and peer review. Each of these methods offers unique processes for resolving disputes. Employers often require arbitration agreements as part of their dispute resolution strategy. Arbitration decisions are typically binding but can be appealed if there is evidence of bias.

Labor Laws

Labor unions such as the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) advocate for laws like the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which aims to combat discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace. Controversies, such as those surrounding restroom usage, highlight the need for respectful and practical solutions that accommodate diverse gender identities while ensuring privacy and comfort for all employees.

Ethical Implications

While various laws prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, gender, and age, ethical concerns extend beyond legal protections. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees’ rights to organize and prohibits employer interference in union activities. Ethical treatment of all workers, regardless of their legal protections, is crucial to fostering a fair and equitable workplace.

Conclusion

In summary, this paper has examined key issues related to workplace investigations, HR best practices for grievance handling, ADR practices, labor laws concerning unions, and the ethical implications of unfair labor practices. By understanding and addressing these areas, organizations can work toward creating fair and just workplaces for all employees.

References

Adler, R. S., & Peirce, E. R. (1992). Legal, ethical, and social implications of the reasonable woman standard in sexual harassment cases, The. Fordham L. Rev., 61, 773.

Bergmann, B. R., & Darity, W. (1981). Social relations, productivity, and employer discrimination. Monthly Labor Review, 104(4), 47-49.

Bimrose, J. (2004). Sexual harassment in the workplace: An ethical dilemma for career guidance practice?. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(1), 109-121.

Crain, M. (1995). Women, labor unions, and hostile work environment sexual harassment: The untold story. Tex. J. Women & L., 4, 9.

Delgado, R., Dunn, C., Brown, P., & Lee, H. (1985). Fairness and formality: Minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wis. L. Rev., 1359.

Dowling, J. M. (2011). Conducting workplace investigations. In Praeger Handbook on Understanding and Preventing Workplace Discrimination: Legal, management, and social science perspectives (Vol. 1, p. 303).

BUS FPX 4046 Assessment 4 Dispute Resolution & Labor Relations

Edwards, H. T. (1986). Alternative dispute resolution: Panacea or anathema?. Harvard Law Review, 99(3), 668-684.

Fitzgerald, L. F., Hulin, C. L., & Drasgow, F. (1994). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model.

Goldberg, S. B., Green, E. D., & Sander, F. E. (1985). Dispute resolution (pp. 517-521). Boston: Little, Brown.

Lepak, D. P., Bartol, K. M., & Erhardt, N. L. (2005). A contingency framework for the delivery of HR practices. Human Resource Management Review, 15(2), 139-159.

People’s World. (n.d.). Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://peoplesworld.org/seiu-aft-joincoalition-to-stop-job-discrimination-vs-gays/

Phillips, M. J. (1991). Employer sexual harassment liability under agency principles: A second look at Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson. Vand. L. Rev., 44, 1229.

About SHRM. (n.d.). Retrieved April 23, 2016, from https://www.shrm.org/pages/default.aspx