Student Name
Capella University
BUS-FPX4068 Contemporary Auditing Using Investigative Accounting Practices
Prof. Name:
Date
In the context of Southeast Ag Supply Company’s potential merger, a forensic accounting firm is essential to ensure transparency and accuracy in the process. Forensic accountants perform three primary types of investigations to support mergers or acquisitions effectively.
A forensic accounting firm may require support from external experts to perform a thorough investigation.
Civil investigations primarily involve assisting in filing complaints, gathering pretrial evidence, and testifying in court. Criminal investigations often go further, with forensic accountants working alongside law enforcement to secure warrants, make arrests, and support plea negotiations.
Both civil and criminal investigations share common elements, such as formal trials involving plaintiffs and defendants, the burden of proof, and potential jury trials. Forensic accountants, attorneys, law enforcement, and courts play significant roles in both types of cases (Hopwood, Young, & Leiner, 2011).
Forensic accountants require diverse skills, including expertise in finance, accounting, and legal matters. Additional training in surveillance, interviewing techniques, criminology, and IT enhances their effectiveness in uncovering fraud. Strong communication skills are essential for presenting findings and collaborating with legal and financial professionals (Hopwood, Young, & Leiner, 2011).
Derek Lodge’s perspective on reasonable assurance highlights the cost-effectiveness of implementing systems to prevent financial misstatements. Conversely, Amber Johnson’s viewpoint emphasizes rigorous compliance for maximum protection against fraud.
Completely preventing financial statement fraud is difficult due to inherent limitations in systems and human factors. However, robust internal controls significantly mitigate these risks (Hopwood, Young, & Leiner, 2011).
An internal auditor reporting directly to the CEO can strengthen fraud prevention by ensuring higher levels of accountability. However, the CEO must actively foster a transparent and compliant organizational culture to enhance the auditor’s effectiveness (Hopwood, Young, & Leiner, 2011).
When fraud is discovered, Rachel Fancy should systematically document evidence, develop a fraud theory, and conduct interviews while maintaining objectivity. Following established procedures ensures credible and legally compliant investigations.
The discovery of fraud should not alter the audit procedure. Rachel must remain impartial and complete the audit as planned, ensuring professional and unbiased reporting.
Rachel’s audit opinion report should detail the fraudulent findings and recommend remedial measures. Engaging relevant stakeholders, including the board of directors and legal authorities, ensures appropriate resolution of the fraud (Hopwood, Young, & Leiner, 2011).
Gibson, N. (2021, March 29). SPACS: Due diligence forensic approach to minimize litigation risk. Retrieved from Forensic Risk Blog
Lowers Forensics International. (2020, February 27). Financial forensics blog. 3 Reasons why a forensic accountant should be a part of the M&A due diligence team. Retrieved from Lowers Forensics
Hopwood, W. S., Young, G. R., & Leiner, J. J. (2011). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination (2nd Edition). McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions. Retrieved from VitalSource
BUS FPX 4068 Assessment 1 Investigative Accounting Practices
Post Categories
Tags