Student Name
Capella University
BUS-FPX4060 Financial Accounting Principles
Prof. Name:
Date
In the world of corporate finance, understanding financial statements is crucial for evaluating the health and performance of a business. In this detailed analysis, we will compare the financial metrics of two companies, Alltech and SynergyXT, based on their respective transaction analysis and key financial statements. By examining the core financial figures—liabilities, equity, income, sales, and expenses—this comparison will provide valuable insights into each company’s financial standing. Let’s dive into the data and understand the key takeaways.
When analyzing the financial health of both Alltech and SynergyXT, several important metrics stand out.
At first glance, SynergyXT appears significantly larger than Alltech in terms of both liabilities and equity. However, Alltech shows impressive net income and a competitive sales figure relative to its smaller size.
Total assets represent the full value of a company’s owned resources, including both current and fixed assets. The total assets invested are crucial indicators of a company’s ability to generate returns on its investments.
Clearly, SynergyXT has a substantial advantage in total assets, which reflects its larger scale of operations compared to Alltech.
One of the most critical financial metrics to assess a company’s efficiency is the Return on Assets (ROA), which measures how effectively a company uses its assets to generate profit. Let’s look at the ROA for both companies:
Alltech:
ROA = Net Income / Average Total Assets
ROA = $3,127 million / (($8,101 million + $11,502 million) / 2) = 31.90%
SynergyXT:
ROA = Net Income / Average Total Assets
ROA = $9,276 million / (($36,171 million + $48,823 million) / 2) = 21.83%
Alltech’s higher ROA suggests that it is more efficient at using its assets to generate profit compared to SynergyXT, despite SynergyXT’s larger asset base.
An essential part of any transaction analysis involves understanding the expenses a company incurs in generating its revenue. These figures help in assessing profitability and operational efficiency.
Alltech:
Expenses = Sales Revenue – Net Income
Expenses = $15,453 million – $3,127 million = $12,326 million
SynergyXT:
Expenses = Sales Revenue – Net Income
Expenses = $44,612 million – $9,276 million = $35,336 million
While SynergyXT spends more on operations, both companies demonstrate effective management in controlling their costs relative to their revenues.
Let’s now compare the balance sheets for two years, which offer a clear snapshot of the companies’ assets, liabilities, and equity over time.
2011 Assets:
Current Assets = $80,990 million
Fixed Assets = $175,000 million
Total Assets = $255,990 million
2012 Assets:
Current Assets = $51,680 million
Fixed Assets = $427,800 million
Total Assets = $479,480 million
2011 Liabilities & Equity:
Current Liabilities = $6,950 million
Equity = $249,000 million
2012 Liabilities & Equity:
Current Liabilities = $37,500 million
Long-Term Liabilities = $105,000 million
Equity = $336,980 million
The increase in total assets and equity from 2011 to 2012 reflects significant growth in Alltech’s business, with a notable increase in fixed assets.
SynergyXT also experienced growth, but its balance sheet is considerably more complex due to larger liabilities and assets. Key figures are as follows:
2012 Assets:
Current Assets = $46,400 million
Fixed Assets = $53,750 million
Total Assets = $100,150 million
Liabilities & Equity:
Current Liabilities = $42,750 million
Equity = $57,400 million
These numbers show that SynergyXT’s assets and liabilities were heavily skewed toward current liabilities, indicating a short-term focus in financing.
The debt ratio is a critical financial metric that shows the proportion of a company’s assets that are financed by debt. Let’s calculate the debt ratio for Alltech and SynergyXT for 2012.
A debt ratio of 29.72% indicates that SynergyXT relies on a moderate amount of debt financing, which is typical for companies of its size and industry.
Adjusting entries ensure that financial statements reflect the true financial condition of a company. Below are some adjustments made to Alltech and SynergyXT’s books in 2012:
These adjustments were necessary to ensure accurate financial reporting and are a key part of the year-end closing process.
The Income Statement provides a summary of a company’s revenues, expenses, and net income over a specific period. For Alltech and SynergyXT, the figures for 2012 are as follows:
SynergyXT 2012 Income Statement:
Revenues = $152,250 million
Expenses = $116,750 million
Net Income = $35,500 million
Retained Earnings:
Beginning Retained Earnings = $52,900 million
Add: Net Income = $35,500 million
Less: Dividends = $42,000 million
Ending Retained Earnings = $46,400 million
This shows that despite higher expenses, SynergyXT maintained solid retained earnings, indicating its ability to reinvest profits back into the business.
In conclusion, both Alltech and SynergyXT exhibit strengths in different areas of their financial statements. Alltech outperforms SynergyXT in terms of Return on Assets (ROA), demonstrating higher efficiency. However, SynergyXT’s larger asset base and higher overall sales revenue show its scale and market presence. Both companies have shown solid growth from 2011 to 2012, with significant improvements in equity and asset values.
Understanding these financial metrics and how they relate to a company’s performance can provide valuable insights for investors, stakeholders, and managers alike.
Wild, John J. and Shaw, Ken W (2022) Financial and Managerial Accounting (9th ed). 3 Adjusting accounts for financial statements. P.58-63. Retrieved from https://capella.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781264098583/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dco ver]!/4/2/2%4054:98
Â
Post Categories
Tags