Student Name
Capella University
HCM-FPX5314 Driving Health Care Results
Prof. Name:
Date
In the past, hospitals primarily utilized fee-for-service or volume-based payment models. These traditional methods incentivized quantity over quality, with financial benefits tied to the number of services provided. This approach, however, led to escalating healthcare costs without necessarily improving patient outcomes. The shift toward value-based purchasing models represents a significant change in the healthcare landscape, focusing on quality rather than volume. This transformation aims to control costs and enhance patient care by rewarding providers based on the value of care delivered.
The value-based purchasing (VBP) model is designed to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Unlike the fee-for-service model, which compensates providers based on the quantity of services, VBP emphasizes the quality and outcomes of care. This model is a response to the need for more patient-centered care and cost-effective practices.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have established four essential domains that healthcare organizations must meet to qualify for incentive payments and avoid penalties:
Organizations adhering to these guidelines can potentially maximize their incentive payments and deliver higher-quality care.
Implementing a value-based model requires significant adjustments from healthcare providers and managers. The transition from a fee-for-service model necessitates a shift in focus toward improving patient outcomes and managing costs effectively.
Healthcare managers play a crucial role in this transition, collaborating with physicians and other stakeholders to make informed decisions on budgeting, policy, and patient care. The value-based model demands that managers prioritize patient experience, clinical efficiency, and adherence to CMS guidelines. Building a collaborative culture and fostering teamwork are essential to navigating these changes successfully.
Shared risk models introduce a different approach by linking financial rewards and risks with healthcare outcomes. Under these models, providers share savings with insurance companies if they successfully reduce costs and improve patient outcomes. Conversely, if costs exceed expectations or outcomes fall short, providers share in the financial losses.
Evidence suggests that shared risk models can lead to substantial cost reductions and improved clinical performance. For instance, in 2017, shared risk models contributed to a 3.5% decrease in total care costs and improved clinical quality performance by 9.2% in California. Additionally, patients in these models experienced significantly lower out-of-pocket costs compared to those under fee-for-service arrangements.
Managing shared risk models requires healthcare organizations to carefully monitor and balance their financial risks. Providers must demonstrate that they meet quality standards while maintaining low operating costs. Failure to achieve these standards can result in negative financial impacts.
To address these challenges, healthcare managers need to focus on maximizing reimbursement potential, improving care quality, and controlling costs. Effective decision-making and strategic planning are crucial for success in a shared risk environment.
A robust organizational culture is fundamental to the success of value-based and shared risk models. Building a culture that aligns with the organization’s values and goals can drive better performance and outcomes. Key strategies for fostering a strong organizational culture include:
The shift from fee-for-service to value-based and shared risk models represents a significant transformation in healthcare management. These models emphasize quality, efficiency, and patient-centered care, aligning financial incentives with improved outcomes. Effective implementation and management of these models require strong organizational culture, strategic planning, and a commitment to continuous improvement. By focusing on these areas, healthcare organizations can enhance their performance, reduce costs, and deliver exceptional care to patients.
Beheshti, N. (2018, September 17). 3 Strategies To Build A Strong Company. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/nazbeheshti/2018/09/17/3-strategies-to-build-a-strong-company-culture/#37a95bd32732
Brown, B. (2018, May 15). Value-Based Purchasing: Four Need-to-Know Domains for 2018. Health Catalyst. Retrieved from https://www.healthcatalyst.com/insights/value-based-purchasing-4-need-to-know-domains-2018
Brown, B., & Crapo, J. (2017). The key to transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based reimbursement. Retrieved from https://downloads.healthcatalyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-Key-to-Transitioning-from-Fee-for-Service-to-Value-Based-Reimbursement.pdf
Damberg, C. L., Sorbero, M. E., Lovejoy, S. L., Martsolf, G. R., Raaen, L., & Mandel, D. (2014). Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions. Rand Health Quarterly, 4(3), 9.
LaPointe, J. (2019, April 26). Financial Risk Sharing in Healthcare Improves Quality, Costs in CA. Xtelligent Healthcare Media. Retrieved from https://revcycleintelligence.com/news/financial-risk-sharing-in-healthcare-improves-quality-costs-in-ca
Meehan, P., Rigby, D., & Rogers, P. (2008). Creating and Sustaining a Winning Culture. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2008/02/creating-and-sustaining-a-winn-1
Morgan, B. (2017, December 11). How To Build The Most Customer-Focused Culture In The World. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/blakemorgan/2017/12/11/how-to-build-the-most-customer-focused-culture-in-the-world/#644863fe56d6
Post Categories
Tags