PSY FPX 7520 Assessment 4 Executive Coaching

Student Name

Capella University

PSY FPX 7520 Social Psychology

Prof. Name:

Date

Abstract

Groupthink is a phenomenon designed to engage employees as a cohesive unit, with their collective efforts aimed at unrealistic goals. While groupthink can be a powerful tool for leading an organization to success, this assessment will explore strategies to enhance creativity among employees through the lens of social psychology and the social influences that contribute to groupthink.

Introduction

The capacity to make sound decisions can be compromised in high-stress environments. Stress often leads to diminished self-esteem, resulting in poor decision-making within organizations, which can contribute to high turnover rates and reduced success. Team-building exercises can help identify and mitigate poor decision-making practices within organizations. Reducing groupthink can benefit an organization by promoting independent thinking and minimizing social influences.

Mental Efficiency

Understanding groupthink and its formation within an organization is crucial for its elimination or reduction. According to Hassan (2014), groupthink occurs when individuals are deeply involved in a group and lack the motivation to consider alternative courses of action. Hassan (2014) defines group cohesion as the force that binds group members together. People often find themselves in group settings, unintentionally seeking cohesion; during conflicts, the group may conform to avoid further discord due to peer pressure. Hassan (2014) further explains that groupthink leads to a decline in mental efficiency, preventing individuals from critically assessing reality or moral judgments. This dynamic often results in one or two vocal individuals emerging as leaders, dictating the direction of the organization.

Decision Groups

Pressure within a group can lead to hasty decisions. Hassan (2014) notes that this pressure can diminish mental efficiency and moral judgment. Groupthink often results in one or two members becoming authoritative figures who dominate discussions, while other members feel isolated and unable to voice differing opinions (Hassan, 2014).

Social Psychology

Social psychology examines behaviors and reactions within social contexts (Maiha & Saidu, 2014). In group settings, challenges arise due to groupthink. In hospital environments, organizational issues and a lack of creativity in problem-solving are prevalent. Many members may hesitate to share their thoughts, leading to a lack of cooperation and ineffective decision-making. This form of groupthink can delay final decisions, resulting in frustration. Implementing a formal procedure with shared goals aligned with the hospital’s mission of care could help eliminate groupthink, making it easier for staff to adapt to new processes (Maiha & Saidu, 2014).

Influence

Staff should feel empowered to express their ideas on improving the referral process without fear of emotional backlash. Social context significantly impacts decision-making and behaviors; some individuals may agree while others may disagree. Self-awareness allows individuals to reason without the burden of self-criticism if a decision turns out to be incorrect (Madigosky & Schaik, 2016). Intelligence and creativity should be prioritized in decision-making while maintaining ethical standards. Personality plays a crucial role in groupthink; Madigosky and Schaik (2016) indicate that individuals with aggressive personalities are less easily influenced and more likely to express their opinions, while those with milder personalities may be more agreeable to avoid conflict. Social groups can either encourage or discourage creativity based on their motives. When individuals are highly motivated, they tend to be more creative and collaborative within the group.

Minimizing Groupthink

Limiting the size of a group is a straightforward method to reduce or eliminate groupthink; larger groups often struggle to make efficient decisions. Encouraging a variety of ideas for potential solutions can also minimize groupthink by fostering consensus in decision-making. Maiha and Saidu (2014) suggest that personality traits can influence group decisions and may present challenges; however, diverse perspectives can enhance creative thinking. Pratkanis and Turner (2013) recommend considering cultural factors to improve the decision-making process, which can encourage more individuals to express their opinions, thereby creating a more positive environment in the hospital.

Conclusion

Groupthink stifles creativity and fosters an unhealthy environment, which can be detrimental to the workplace. A lack of faculty participation can limit an organization’s potential and may even lead to a crisis.

References

Hassan, M. A. G. (2014, January 1). Groupthink principles and fundamentals in organizations. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Groupthink-principles-and-fundamentals-in-Hassan/aa7d15b59da0c492d19bed3dbf34408a2949b840

Madigosky, W., & Schaik, S. (2016). Context matters: Groupthink and outcomes of health care teams. Medical Education, 50(4), 387-389.

Maiha, A. H., & Saidu, U. (2014). Local government administration and its impending problems in recent times. International Journal of Social Sciences, 9(9).