Student Name
Chamberlain University
NR-730: DNP Project
Prof. Name:
Date
Moagi et al. (2021) emphasize the importance of culturally competent mental health services as an evidence-based intervention for addressing disparities faced by the LGBTQ+ community. This approach recognizes that stigma, discrimination, and a lack of inclusive healthcare resources worsen mental health outcomes for sexual and gender minorities. The intervention focuses on training nurses, counselors, and other healthcare professionals to provide affirming and inclusive care tailored to the unique needs of LGBTQ+ individuals. By fostering supportive healthcare environments, this strategy aims to reduce inequities and improve overall well-being within this vulnerable group.
Compared to heterosexual and cisgender peers, LGBTQ+ youth are at higher risk of experiencing anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (Moagi et al., 2021). These challenges often stem from experiences of social rejection, bullying, discrimination, and identity-based stigma. Evidence highlights the need for supportive structures in schools, families, and communities to mitigate these risks and promote resilience. Legislative and policy reforms are also urged to ensure that mental health promotion efforts reach this underserved population.
A systematic review by Malik et al. (2023) investigated the mental health disparities affecting homosexual men and minority populations. The study found that social isolation, humiliation, and systemic discrimination significantly contribute to elevated levels of psychological distress, including substance abuse, depression, and anxiety disorders. These findings reinforce the need for inclusive health policies and interventions that target the specific needs of marginalized groups.
Question | Answer |
---|---|
What is the key evidence-based intervention identified by Moagi et al. (2021)? | The provision of culturally competent mental health services tailored to LGBTQ+ individuals, emphasizing inclusive training for healthcare professionals. |
Why is this intervention critical for LGBTQ+ youth? | LGBTQ+ youth face higher risks of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation due to stigma, discrimination, and social rejection, making culturally responsive care essential. |
What supportive environments are recommended to reduce risks for LGBTQ+ youth? | Affirming families, inclusive schools, and supportive communities are crucial in reducing negative outcomes and promoting well-being. |
What did Malik et al. (2023) highlight in their systematic review? | They found that minority groups, especially homosexual men, experience elevated psychological issues caused by social isolation, humiliation, and discrimination. |
How can disparities be addressed according to these studies? | By implementing inclusive policies, training healthcare professionals in cultural competence, and developing targeted interventions that meet the unique needs of marginalized groups. |
The studies collectively demonstrate that addressing mental health disparities in the LGBTQ+ population requires multi-level interventions—including culturally competent clinical practices, supportive community environments, and policy-driven reforms. By integrating these approaches, healthcare systems can reduce stigma-driven inequities and foster better psychological outcomes for LGBTQ+ individuals.
Creating safer environments for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LBGQT) youth and families: Opportunities for school mental health promotion. (2016). In Mental health promotion in schools (pp. 131–155). Bentham Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681083230116020009
Malik, M., Iqbal, S., Noman, M., Sarfraz, Z., Sarfraz, A., & Mustafa, S. (2023). Mental health disparities among homosexual men and minorities: A systematic review. American Journal of Men’s Health, 17(3), 155798832311766. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231176646
Moagi, M. M., Der Wath, A., Jiyane, P. M., & Rikhotso, R. S. (2021). Mental health challenges of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: An integrated literature review. Health SA Gesondheid, 26, 1487. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1487
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Post Categories
Tags