Student Name
Chamberlain University
POLI-330: Political Science
Prof. Name:
Date
The Electoral College was created to balance voting power among states in the presidential election process. Unlike a nationwide popular vote, the president is elected by electors who pledge support for specific candidates and cast their votes based on the results in their states. Most states use the “winner-takes-all” system, where the candidate who wins the majority in a state claims all its electoral votes. Maine and Nebraska are exceptions, distributing electoral votes proportionally. This structure aims to prevent larger states from dominating elections but has also been criticized for distorting the alignment between the popular vote and electoral outcomes.
The 2000 presidential election took place on November 7, 2000, as President Bill Clinton was completing his term. The election involved ten candidates and highlighted the complexities of the Electoral College. Of the 538 electoral votes, 270 were needed to win. Controversies over “hanging chads” and confusing butterfly ballots led to disputes about vote validity, complicating the final tally.
Al Gore won the popular vote with 50,996,039 votes, while George W. Bush received 50,456,141 votes. However, Bush won the Electoral College with 271 votes, narrowly surpassing the required majority, while Gore secured 267 votes. This discrepancy between the popular and electoral votes ignited debates about the Electoral College’s effectiveness and fairness, as the system produced a president who did not win the popular vote.
Concerns over the Electoral College resurfaced in the 2016 election, prompting questions about whether the system remains just and relevant in modern times. Critics argue that it undermines democratic principles by occasionally producing outcomes contrary to the popular vote. This disconnect has led to calls for reform or replacement of the system.
Critics contend that the Electoral College is outdated and unfairly benefits swing states, granting them outsized influence. The unequal distribution of voting power means some votes carry more weight than others, depending on location. Rogue electors, who vote against their state’s choice, and polarizing incidents, such as the Capitol Hill riot, have further fueled arguments for reform.
Proposed reforms aim to address these issues by aligning the system more closely with democratic principles. One suggestion is to adjust the weight of electoral votes to better reflect population and demographics, preventing certain states from holding disproportionate power. Another proposal advocates for abandoning the “winner-takes-all” system in favor of a proportional approach.
Several specific plans have been proposed:
Additionally, some reformers propose replacing the Electoral College entirely with a direct popular vote, ensuring that the candidate with the most votes nationwide becomes president.
Aspect | Description | Criticisms and Reform Proposals |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Balances voting power among states; electors cast votes based on state results, with most states using “winner-takes-all.” | Criticized as outdated; disproportionately benefits swing states; distorts the alignment between the popular and electoral votes. |
Presidential Election 2000 | Popular vote favored Gore (50,996,039 votes) over Bush (50,456,141 votes); Bush won with 271 electoral votes versus Gore’s 267. | Discrepancy sparked fairness debates; “hanging chads” and confusing ballots highlighted systemic flaws. |
Proposed Reforms | Adjust electoral vote weight based on population; adopt proportional or district-based systems; eliminate electors entirely or use direct popular voting. | Reform aims to modernize and democratize elections, ensuring no state or voter group holds disproportionate influence. |
Aldrich, J., Reifler, J., & Munger, M. (2015). Sophisticated and myopic? Citizen preferences for Electoral College reform. Public Choice, 158(3-4), 541-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0056-z
Bugh, G. (2016). Electoral college reform (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Edwards, G. (2019). Why the Electoral College is bad for America (3rd ed.). Yale University Press.
Paige, L., & Neale, T. (2018). The Electoral College: An overview and analysis of reform proposals. Everycrsreport.com. Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30804.html.
Virgin, S. (2017). Competing loyalties in electoral reform: An analysis of the U.S. Electoral College. Electoral Studies, 49, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.07.003
Post Categories
Tags